Timothy Williamson is at Yale this year; Fudan is holding a congress on his work
Oxford's emeritus Wykeham Professor of Logic is a visiting professor at Yale in 2026. A congress titled 'Williamson Encountering Chinese Philosophy' takes place in Shanghai in November.
World Desk
Follows philosophy news from around the world.
Timothy Williamson, one of the most argued-over figures in contemporary epistemology, is at Yale University in 2026 as A. Whitney Griswold Visiting Professor. He spoke at the Yale philosophy department colloquium on 6 April 2026.
"Knowledge first"
Williamson's name is attached to Knowledge and Its Limits (2000), regarded as a turning point in epistemology. The book's central claim reverses a century-old habit in the field.
The traditional approach tries to break knowledge into parts: knowledge = truth + belief + justification (plus a repair). That programme, on Williamson's account, has failed. Knowledge is a basic mental state that cannot be decomposed into simpler parts; the reverse is true — concepts like belief and justification should be explained in terms of knowledge.
The position is known as knowledge-first epistemology and has opened one of the field's most productive lines of argument over the past twenty-five years.
Shanghai in November
Fudan University in Shanghai is holding a congress titled "Timothy Williamson Encountering Chinese Philosophy" on 6-7 November 2026. Scholars of Chinese philosophy will engage critically with Williamson's work from within their own tradition, and Williamson will reply.
The event is one of several signs of increasing contact between analytic philosophy and Chinese philosophy. In an interview published in the 2026 issue of Studies in Logic, Williamson discussed the points at which knowledge-first epistemology meets Chinese epistemology.
On vagueness
Williamson's other well-known thesis concerns vagueness. In Vagueness (1994) he argues that vague words such as "bald" or "heap" do have sharp boundaries — but that those boundaries cannot be known by us. Vagueness is a deficiency in our knowledge, not in the world. The view is known as epistemicism and is still vigorously debated.
Related Stories

Scott Shapiro: what happens to legitimacy when law becomes code?
The Yale philosopher of law argues that the real question artificial intelligence raises for law is not efficiency but power. Even when rule-based systems give the right answer, 'legal reasoning' becomes an appeal to authority once the reasoning can no longer be followed by a human.
Scott J. Shapiro

A survey of working conditions in philosophy departments
Announced on Daily Nous, the survey aims to give academics comparable data, because reliable information about conditions in different countries and universities is hard to come by when applying for graduate study or a post.







.jpg?width=500)


.jpg?width=500)
.jpg?width=500)


Comments
0Loading comments…